Ironies in Works Cited

From an email I sent yesterday:
"I'm reading this book for work called The New Evidence. He constantly uses tertiary sources and I might track him down and kick him in the nuts."

If submitted in a university class, this book would fail.

Irony of all ironies, I am reading a section of the book today called "Did the Writer Use Primary Sources?" It is about how to tell if a text is valid.

I propose that either this guy goes to the original sources or rename it The Sucky Evidence.

Powered by Qumana